Hari the Hadron

Wednesday, March 16, 2005

FAILING MARRIAGES AND INCREASING DIVORCES – LOVE HAS BECOME MERE LUST

For time immemorial Marriage has been a contract for union of body, heart and soul of a man and woman. As with elapse of time everything depreciates or degrades, even the definition of marriage has depreciated and become reduced to a mere contract for legalised union of bodies. It has become a just an arrangement for legally satisfying our lust.

Recently there was an article in “India Today” about increasing divorce among young newly wedded couples with many of them falling apart within a few months of marriage. Is it a result of e-love or love at first sight through internet. Love at first sight reminds me of a joke where this phenomena was stated to be the best example that light moves faster than sound. Two youngsters fall in love the moment they see each other (impact of light), but only once they get to talk to each other that they realize the gravity of the mistake they have committed(impact of sound).

Now coming back to the degradation to the definition of marriage, you see media everywhere giving so much importance to the physical relationship in marriage, that other aspects of marriage sounds to be secondary or unimportant. Watching, reading and listening to this message has created a mindset in the younger generation that marriage is nothing but having a company at home for a legalized physical relationship and for some lucky ones, it also means having an unpaid servant catering to all our needs. This is where the concept of love between married couples is getting reduced to mere lust. Let me clarify here that I am no a saint and I do appreciate the necessity of physical relationship in marriage, but I do not wish to see physical relationship in isolation as I also see it as a catalyst to forge and develop a much stronger mental relationship. I am also not using the three letter word because of the danger of my blog being categorized as an adult blog. All marriages begin with lust and nobody can deny that, but the intention to use the physical relationship as a catalyst for evolution of love out of the lust must be there in every couple’s mind. Marriage is fully consummated only when the lust gets transformed and evolves into love in due course. This aspect of transformation of lust into love is sadly absent in many of current day marriages and the result is before all of us.

In today’s materialistic world everything in our life begins and ends with money. You find most of the couples working twelve to fourteen hours a day in the quest for making maximum money to making their life more comfortable now and for a secure retired life. So once they are back home late in the evening, they look at their spouses only as a tool to comfort, relax and relieve their stress and not as a soul who also requires comfort, relaxation and relief from his/her stress. It is only a demanding situation and not a give and take scenario, result lust remains lust.

I recently read a spiritual personality state that every human whether man or woman requires a balance of both masculine and feminine qualities in them depending on their gender. The masculine qualities should enable them to be strong, hardworking and enduring whereas the feminine qualities should enable them to be warm, humble, polite, peace loving and affectionate. Please do not misunderstand feminine qualities to mean qualities of a woman. Here the meaning is different. Masculine and feminine traits are different from man and woman if you understand it in depth with a spiritual mind.

This balance helps a man to be not only strong, hardworking and demanding but also to treat his wife as his woman when he requires her that way, as a mother when he feels weak and in need of support and as his child when she is weak and in need of support. This same balance helps a woman too to be strong, hardworking and enduring and at the same time treat her husband like her man, her father and as her child. It is this way that love evolves in it entirety between them and there is a true and enduring union of heart, soul and body.

So let us all try to prevent this degradation of definition of marriage and use marriage as a relationship for evolution of universal love rather than as a tool to fulfill our thirst for lust. I am sure there would be no divorces, when we see our husband and wives in a more larger role. Lastly let me clarify all statements made here are gender neutral and applies equally to men as well as women.

28 Comments:

  • Hi everybody. Please feel free to comment. even criticism would be a compliment.

    By Blogger hari, at 11:03 PM  

  • Hi Hari, I cant help thinking that divorce is more socially acceptable now in India than before - which is why more couples are taking that option. Because they can. I think that's especially true in the West. The institution of marriage appears to be slowly dying out, and live-in (or common-law) relationships are the norm. BUT - and this is important - live-in relationships are considered to be as legally binding as a marriage in the eyes of the law, after a certain period of time.

    One last thing... I doubt anybody who gets married does it in the expectation of getting a divorce a little down the line. Most people anticipate a happy married life - but sometimes things just dont work out.

    By Blogger Shammi, at 1:41 AM  

  • Very true!!!

    By Blogger Bharath Kota, at 2:43 AM  

  • Today our generation is very quick to take the easy way out and well i guess society has become much more tolerant and all that but that is also affecting teh sanctity of the institution of marriage itself...

    In times not so long ago small misunderstandings would not lead to divorce and couples made an effort to stick with it.. no matter what..

    presently, i guess priorities have changed.. outlook has changed... and it will keep changing hopefully not for the worse like outside India where marriage is just another contract.. mostly.. SIGH !!! its depressing..

    balance is needed.. yes.. the art of compromising and sometimes letting go of egos and issues also is needed.. the need to laugh more.. spend quality time.. to be together.. to dream together.. complementing each other's weakness and strengths that is what one should focus on !!! :)

    By Blogger Pallavi, at 2:45 AM  

  • Gud post - I agree with u when u say that men and women shld think neutrally and putting 'u' in 'their' place. But i also agrre with Shyam tht no one gets married to get a divorce - every1 longs for a long happy marriage - but if it doesnt work out - its nt entirely their fault. Yes wht is their fault is they didnt try to work it out nd gave up too soon.

    By Blogger Mausmi J, at 4:13 AM  

  • Gud post - I agree with u when u say that men and women shld think neutrally and putting 'u' in 'their' place. But i also agrre with Shyam tht no one gets married to get a divorce - every1 longs for a long happy marriage - but if it doesnt work out - its nt entirely their fault. Yes wht is their fault is they didnt try to work it out nd gave up too soon.

    By Blogger Mausmi J, at 4:14 AM  

  • Gud post..
    Even I read the article in India Today..
    Did u notice the most of the women were Independent I mean Working.. that makes the diff.. 10 or 15 years back, Not many women were working, Even if they don’t like their relationship.. they hav to go with that.. Nowadays it's not the same..

    By Blogger Sathish N, at 4:49 AM  

  • I think our generation or the young generation you so talk of, shouldnt be cast irresponsible by condemning the way they choose to live. I am really very sure that the larger percentage of marriages happen to find a soulmate and a life partner and Sex is just one of the aspects of it. I am very sure, knowing many a young couples around me, that no marriage expects just sex of the other partner. The reason for Divorces are not that. The reason for divorces are hidden within the new fabric of Urban life that we have created for ourselves today. It lies with the greater awareness, confidence, and education. The reasons lie within the cross cultural marriages, and the varied backgrounds that people come from.

    By Blogger Unknown, at 4:52 AM  

  • And the awareness of all these are only gradual. Plus lets not forget our fascination for the Western Developed World. We tend to copy them in all ways, clothing, food, ,lifestyle... to be like them; to be developed. Its a process - a chaos - that shall clear in time only. Organization comes only after Chaos. I am sorry but i dont have greater faith in marriages that have lasted forever, in boredom and subdued personalities.

    By Blogger Unknown, at 4:55 AM  

  • Great post, Hari. As usual, I heartily, nay, 'lust'ily agree ;)with the clarity of your thoughts and writing! Cheeers, Ravi

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:01 AM  

  • I definitely dont agree to this being a good post.. Failing marriages and increasing divorces doesnt happen coz of lack of love.
    It happens coz of thousands of other reasons too. One is about how ready you are for it and how ready you are to adjust to the other person. Half the people are thrown into the system before even they know how to deal with it.
    I am happy that I found a person whoz perfectly imperfect for me and we are just fine. I do not undermine lust though... When people asked me if it was only lust and not love in a relationship , I would always say
    "love without lust and lust without love can never survive on its own". They need to coexist for a marriage or for a relationsip to last long and to even survive in this world !

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:32 AM  

  • Dear Hari: U have opened the 'Pandora's box'.Stirred a hornet's nest.I t is not that simple to be dealt that way.Some of the comments are disturbing.One thing is clear.People approach the institution of marriage without knowing, what it is and What they want.Lust is a crude word.Carnal desores is an apt word.I tend to agree with tt that there are myriad reasons for failure of marriages now.Again it is a cruel combination if individual and social perceptions,physical needs,Economic factors and so on.
    I can understand your anxiety in this and do agree with U when U say
    'attraction' should culminate in affection'whch again expands to sacrifice,tolerance,give and take and so on.
    If all the opinions of youngsters,
    aged,spiritualists,social reformers
    moralists,preachers are taken in and their perceptions are to be published 'Veda Vysa' would be put to shame as "Mahabhartha' and 'Srimad Bhagavatham'would be miniscule in size.
    O.K Pl do write.Blessings

    By Blogger Aero Dillon, at 7:42 AM  

  • Dear Hari: U have opened the 'Pandora's box'.Stirred a hornet's nest.I t is not that simple to be dealt that way.Some of the comments are disturbing.One thing is clear.People approach the institution of marriage without knowing, what it is and What they want.Lust is a crude word.Carnal desores is an apt word.I tend to agree with tt that there are myriad reasons for failure of marriages now.Again it is a cruel combination if individual and social perceptions,physical needs,Economic factors and so on.
    I can understand your anxiety in this and do agree with U when U say
    'attraction' should culminate in affection'whch again expands to sacrifice,tolerance,give and take and so on.
    If all the opinions of youngsters,
    aged,spiritualists,social reformers
    moralists,preachers are taken in and their perceptions are to be published 'Veda Vysa' would be put to shame as "Mahabhartha' and 'Srimad Bhagavatham'would be miniscule in size.
    O.K Pl do write.Blessings

    By Blogger Aero Dillon, at 7:47 AM  

  • Dear Hari: U have opened the 'Pandora's box'.Stirred a hornet's nest.I t is not that simple to be dealt that way.Some of the comments are disturbing.One thing is clear.People approach the institution of marriage without knowing, what it is and What they want.Lust is a crude word.Carnal desores is an apt word.I tend to agree with tt that there are myriad reasons for failure of marriages now.Again it is a cruel combination if individual and social perceptions,physical needs,Economic factors and so on.
    I can understand your anxiety in this and do agree with U when U say
    'attraction' should culminate in affection'whch again expands to sacrifice,tolerance,give and take and so on.
    If all the opinions of youngsters,
    aged,spiritualists,social reformers
    moralists,preachers are taken in and their perceptions are to be published 'Veda Vysa' would be put to shame as "Mahabhartha' and 'Srimad Bhagavatham'would be miniscule in size.
    O.K Pl do write.Blessings

    By Blogger Aero Dillon, at 7:51 AM  

  • Does this post seem to have taken a divorce before letting the mind to work for some more time on saving their marriage ... ;) Sorry, I could not stop kidding...:) But I do think there are other points to ponder before blaming on lust or modern culture for failures of marriages.

    First and foremost of all, is there a need to worry about divorces? For that first, why is marriage needed for anyone? What could have made man to make such an arrangement during the development of society and civilisation? Was that for pure companionship alone? If so, why was it limited to only two people? Why not more than two when companionship could still be there?

    The reasons, must have been different. While I was first reading this post, I was watching a documentary about the 'darkside of dolphins' on BBC. It was startling to see how these 'gentle' creatures have a very interesting way of life when it comes to ensuring the succession of their genes. There were pairs of male dolphins who kidnap and keep the female with them till someone else kidnaps her from them. There were also small groups of male dolphins who keep under control a set of female dolphins, while exchange the partners between them. These groups, because of their strength in numbers, were secure and were capable of stealing other female dolphins from other groups. What we could possibly see in this behaviour of these otherwise 'wise' animals, may be the life patterns probably even human has gone through in our days in caves and perhaps even before while still on trees!

    Firstly, these kidnappings were not for carnal pleasure (though dolphins are known for casual carnal relations), but more for progeny. If you think logically, if the group becomes larger and act as a society for other more imperative reasons like hunting or survival, there should have been a need for some kind of an arrangement within the group to retain the harmony. Within the dolphin groups, one interesting feature of their life was how the female dolphins were constantly mating with different partners within a short span of time, about which the scientists concluded as for making sure that their offsprings do not get killed by other male dolphins as then the male dolphins may adopt them as their own offsprings. Now that still seems chaos. But humans would have made a further leap in these relations at some stage, when they might have restricted on the number of partners.

    If you think about it, though marriage was something that really works against the natural inclinations for a variety of genes for the survival of the species, women might have adopted to this way of life at some point of time, as that provided more security to their offsprings as a family. I believe men had a better deal out this even then as, though we had matriarchal societies, the ones that survived are patriarchal societies where bigamy for men was more norm.

    Now how all this fit into this current topic of divorces. Indian societies were not having many divorces in the past not for the reason our blogger might be wondering about. It had nothing to do with the increasing lust (which, in its reasonable form and purpose as a tool for progeny, was probably the reason that was behind in the evolution of marraiges) or with the increasing busy life of our generation or with e-love. It will be naive to think that our fathers' and forefathers' marriages were blissful in the arranged marriages of our indian culture. The understanding that was mentioned in the post were surely there, alas at the terrible cost of mental and emotional pain of many of our parents. They were probably blissfully unaware this, especially women, as they have been taught by our culture to chin it up from their birth till death. Or they were not brave enough to go it alone in a society which had very little support and opportunities to offer. Perhaps the latter. Perhaps both and more.

    There is nothing to worry about divorces as the way they happen now. Western cultures have more divorces for reasons that are not contemplated by our traditionlists. Those are not because of a moral degradation. They are more because in those developed societies a woman can survive without a permanent partner. It is the undoing of an institution for the very reasons that made it to come to existence. Humans have developed into more civilised societies where those insecurities can now be cast aside.

    So it only shows that our indian women are finally finding their rightful place in the society with the opportunities they can avail of now. Unfortunately they need to still fight against what we and they had been expected to believe before. And also the traditionlists who still believe the only way in life is by keeping a marital relation at very dear personal cost.

    There is another face to these divorces also. Because of our inbred beliefs and also because of this newly found independence, our generation get into marriages early and leave when it does not suit. These are only early chaos and as someone pointed out there will be lesser number of divorces in the future when our younger generation knows whom to marry and what, if you get into, a marriage will really mean.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:32 PM  

  • Hari,
    Good post, though I think that most marriages still follow the security and homelife needed by age 25 route rather than lust governing everything...the dynamics of man-women relationship are changing and I think both the sexes are ill equipped to handle it, given the stress they are under - office and soceity..
    Anu

    By Blogger Anu, at 10:34 PM  

  • Hari - a very good post. As Shyam says, no one is getting married with an intention to end it in few months or years down the line. Its just that things don't work out between the couple. The same thing has happened before as well, where the women (generally) would either give up fighting losing her personal dignity or would be brutally suppressed. But these days, people have other options. One question to ponder is, whenever theres any misunderstanding b/n the couple, what are the steps taken by them to solve it. Do they both really give themselves another chance? or Do they think that its not worth living together at all based on few instances of misunderstanding? It wouldn't be for us to discuss this as it would depend on case to case and only the concerned persons can answer. Anyhow, the trend of increasing divorces is definitely disturbing.

    By Blogger Chakra, at 3:36 AM  

  • I am not sure I am "experienced" enough to comment on such an issue. But anywayz, Doesnt anyone here think Marriage as an instituition has outlived its utility? I cant think of anything other than religion which has lasted this long!

    By Blogger Harish, at 4:26 AM  

  • I don't think I am in the right age to comment, but this post has definitely triggered lot of thoughts. Well done, Hari.

    By Blogger Indian Voter, at 9:37 AM  

  • Good post. Very thought provoking.

    You are right that people are more materialistic these days, and couples are too busy and don't spend time together, which is resulting in more divorces. There are also couples who do not want to give up on career and hence do not live together or have ego clashes due to their designation/role in their job.

    It's an influence of other cultures too, which is making some of us less family oriented. I also blame meaningless advertisements and cinema which portray love and marriage to be something frivolous and all-perfect. These are contributing to false notions when entering the institution of marriage and setting wrong expectations in minds, especially when people get married at a younger age.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:25 PM  

  • Hi everybody,
    I am just overwhelmed by such qualitative and enlightening comments from all of you. Thank you so much. And especially the comments criticising my post and thought is most helpful.

    I want to reply to each of your comments, but I thought it best to do so in the form of a post itself, so I would return soon with a sequel to this post. A bit busy at the moment with year-end works. Thank you all again.

    By Blogger hari, at 6:59 PM  

  • Hari,

    I agree with most of what you say...but what I do not understand is the fact that people think Divorce as a problem, while I look at it this way 'Divorce is solution to a problem, when two people discover that they will be happier away from each other, rather than with each other'.

    -Anu

    By Blogger Anu, at 1:38 AM  

  • WOW, what a come back for me ... I mean I loved reading not only the post - but the comments too - I have my own view about this and it does co relate to some of your points and does have a regression from some of your points - mathematically speaking ... *wink*

    Anyways I am excited as well as tired - so, I just wana reply to one point - 'Karpagam' had pointed out to 'Live - in' relationships ... now that - THAT is DESPICABLE.

    I am quiet passionate when it comes to this particular topic - I mean how does a woman let herself be treated with such indignity ? Well, we both are hot and horny for each other, lets do it, lets go at it like bunnies, burn ourselves out, live together during that time share the bed share the roof and then when you're tired of me or I'm tired of you or some problem crops up - lets say good bye and lets be 'friends'

    BULL SHIT

    I'm Sorry Hari - for the language - but Hey - black is black; shit is shit.

    So, where was I? You know what's wrong ... Taking things for granted. Why did the elders have 'married lives' ... they showed some restraint, some respect.

    Number one : When they fell inlove they either died or lived for their love. All those 'feel good' love stories.

    Number one : They showed considerable restraint.

    Above all numbers : How many have read the Kama Sutra ??? Why was it written ??? FOR PORNOGRAPHIC Pleasure ??? PLEASE - We Indians - We are so so so BLIND - I dont think the Kama Sutra was a pornography - It was an educational thing.

    Our ancestors understood the one and only thing most important to a woman very well - they knew it was not beauty or money - but brains - they were clever enough to develop brains ... They aimed at enticing their 'woman' - Our society was originally 'Monogamy' - check it out.

    All this rubbish about the Kama Sutra itself is stupidity - It is a fantastic source of sex education and the central focus of Indian Man's / woman's sexual secret WAS (unfortunate to use the past tense)Sexual Continence ...

    Nowadays no body wants to wait - instant gratification ... No waiting, no tolerance, no understanding - no nothing

    Oh lots of love - IF s/he loves me s/he will not do such and such thing - CRAP - why cant the concerned s/he do what ever it is or just plain ask ??? NOPE - EGO ...

    We've let lots of 'childishness' into our relationships and not being matured ... That's what's wrong - AND the worst ever Kiddish shameful behaviour is - LIVE IN - I'm a woman and I speak to the women - Women - you are to be ashamed to let this indignity happen to you. The hardest two letter word is NO but it is the only right one at times.

    Marriage and Divorce - Later :-)

    Ps: When u find my blog template changed *Yet again* kindly bear with me ... With all the time I now have - am hunting for the best or creating the best - whichever happens first *wink*

    By Blogger Loveena Raj, at 4:16 AM  

  • nice post and a great discussion too.

    I personally feel that divorce rate is on the rise due to various reasons, the most important being the ego of the individuals. ours is still a male dominant society and unless and untill all the males understand that things have changed, and women need to be given the due respect, its gonna be tough. I'm not criticising only men, but its high time that men also start adjusting.

    wise people have already said - "aasai arubadhu naal, mogam muppadhu naal". after that love will evolve only if we are flexible and I believe we can.

    By Blogger saranyan r, at 11:45 AM  

  • hi hari..
    wonderful post.. loev & lust or two seperate things.. when lust becomes a priority in relation.. love will diminish..

    and well as some body discussed here.. the marriage system too has gotta do something here.. there are cases where the parents are insisting on the children to marry someone of their choice though they know they are no right match.. there by creating this barrier.. but i don't mean to say all love marriages ended up succesfully..
    but finally oe things when true love exists be it an arranged marriage or love marriage.. as u said without love witout lust... and when people become more empathetic about others... esp life partners.. i guess divorces are less heard..
    i agree the urbanized life is contributing to the rate of divorces. i heard people marrying coz they could earn more together.. mena to say they are putting financial gains on top thatn the love they could share.. i guess those care the cases who end up divorcing.. a very goood post hari.. sorry for being late here..

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:44 AM  

  • Just because divorces have grown in past few years ,doesnt mean independence of women is the cause.

    Let's understand, every coin has two sides.Some relationships are better ended than dragged along.But cases like that of spears are really impious.

    I agree that concept Love at first sight is as dumb as it gets..but meeting people using internet is not a bad idea.For marriage it is important you find an appropiate person.Internet makes the search easy but should be followed with personal face to face meetngs

    By Blogger anubhav, at 11:00 AM  

  • Dear Hari.U still seem to keep the 'PandOrA's Box' open.We have all commented in march.U do not totally condemn an indtitution if one or two sections go wrong.U don't demolish an esthetically constructed temple,mandir,art hall etc just because a few are not able to appreciate it or get along with it.In the first place why do they get into it in a hurried way without going in to the pros and cons?
    U almost hit the nail on the head when U sais lust cannot be a basis though biological necessity is there as in any creature in nature.
    Pl see my bodhimaram.blogspot.com where in one of my posts I have discussed man Vs Woman and Masculine and Feminine as U have righrly mentioned.
    If U are to changre your partners as Farmrs change the crops according to season or market demand then marriage becomes a "Contract of convenience and commerce". All the best.partha krish

    By Blogger Aero Dillon, at 9:23 AM  

  • Who knows where to download XRumer 5.0 Palladium?
    Help, please. All recommend this program to effectively advertise on the Internet, this is the best program!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7:16 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home